9.0–10
Exceptional within its category, with few significant barriers for the intended player.
Editorial scorecard
A number is the end of the note, not the beginning.
We use the same six questions for every game, then explain where the overall score may not match your priorities.
The six criteria
What we look for
Ratings summarise an editorial view. They are not user scores and are never purchased placements.
| Criterion | Question | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| First hour | Does the game teach its goals without burying the player? | 20% |
| Decision quality | Do choices noticeably change what happens next? | 20% |
| Interface clarity | Can important information be found when it matters? | 15% |
| Platform fit | Does the control scheme suit the device? | 15% |
| Return value | Does the repeated loop remain interesting? | 20% |
| Respect for time | Can a player pause, return and understand the next step? | 10% |
Reading the result
8.8 is not automatically better than 8.2.
A tactical action game can earn a high score and still be a poor fit for someone looking for a quiet mobile routine. Start with the best-fit note, then use the score to compare similar options.
8.0–8.9
A strong recommendation for the right audience, with clearly stated trade-offs.
Below 8.0
Potentially worthwhile, but with friction that deserves careful consideration.